7 Comments
User's avatar
Matt Benacci's avatar

You are correct. That is the essential question. And once you start trying to define it for yourself, things get difficult.

Expand full comment
Grant Davies's avatar

The question can be difficult. And the answer doesn't make it easy. But it makes it easier. Or less hard, I guess.

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

While the initial spark at conception may not produce a breathing human, I think we know that a life has begun. As (true) science has progressed we know that the baby's heart is functioning somewhere between 15-18 weeks. At that point, I think no rational person could argue that taking that life is murder. I'm glad it's up to each state to make that call.

Expand full comment
Grant Davies's avatar

" 15-18 weeks. At that point, I think no rational person could argue that taking that life is murder."

It's unclear to me what this means. Clarification would be great.

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

Should have added the word "NOT". 15-18 weeks. At that point, I think no rational person could argue that taking that life is NOT murder."

Expand full comment
Mike Cribby's avatar

Life begins at conception. All attempts to argue viability, 10 weeks this, 15 weeks that, are simply justification for infanticide. Fundamental facts.

Expand full comment
Grant Davies's avatar

Thanks for commenting Mike. Most people are reticent to comment on any issue as emotionally charged as this one. My reluctance to write about it was overcome by my desire to address it from a fundamental perspective so it can be (possibly) boiled down to the essential question. Many think they know the answers. I'm better at discovering the questions than I am at the answers. Thanks again.

Expand full comment